Matilda White Riley

Last Updated: August 19, 2025
Headshot of Matilda White Riley

1986 ASA President

Matilda White Riley
Presidential Address
Obituary

Matilda White Riley was born in Boston on April 19, 1911. She spent her early years in Maine before venturing to Radcliffe for college. Her doctorate came later, following years of work as a research assistant in the newly formed Department of Sociology at Harvard University, management of a market research company, a position during World War II in the War Production Board, more than a decade as executive officer of a professional association, several university professorships, and finally a role in charge of social science research in the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health.

She attended high school at Brunswick High School in Maine, where she met a young man named Jack Riley was her constant friend. They were married in 1931 and enjoyed 70 years together. In 1986, Riley noted that “Jack and I have been fortunate, since our two careers have often run parallel courses and provided opportunity for collaborative publication.” They were frequent co-authors of professional papers, starting in the 1930’s with the publication of a joint scientific paper on contraceptive behavior.

Riley later earned D.Sc. degree from Bowdoin College in 1972, and L.H.D. from Rutgers University in 1973. In 1985, Riley and her husband served as co-Presidents of the District of Columbia Sociological Society.

Matilda White Riley served the ASA in many capacities during her professional life. She served as Executive Officer of the ASA headquarters from 1949 to 1960, and later she was elected to serve as the 77th President of the Association. Her Presidential Address, “On The Significance of Age in Sociology,” was delivered at the organization’s annual meeting in New York City in the summer of 1986.

Riley’s world changed forever in early 2002 when Jack Riley died, ending their 70 year collaboration as personal and professional partners. She lived in Maine until her death in the fall of 2004.


Obituary

Matilda and John (Jack) Riley adopted me into their extensive family of scholars, scientists, co-workers, professors, students, and friends in June 1974. At the time I didn’t know that my first acquaintance with them at this second session of the Social Science Research Council (SSRC) Committee on Work and Personality in the Middle Years (chaired by Orville G. Brim, Jr.) would change the direction of my professional and personal life. I had just joined the SSRC’s staff, and this committee session was my introduction to the Council and its activities. What an introduction it was! The subject matter was completely new; the committee members were world renowned; the meals were delicious, and the fellowship was congenial. Matilda and Jack welcomed my wife and me warmly to their dinner table, and there began 30 years in their “convoy of social support.”

During that dinner and the subsequent five years of SSRC conversations, the outline of Matilda and Jack’s joint lives emerged. It is impossible to speak of Matilda’s life or Jack’s without mentioning the other. They were childhood sweethearts in Maine and spent their lives together until Jack’s death in 2002. Jack informed me of Matilda’s life and accomplishments, and Matilda recounted Jack’s. Together they regaled their listeners about life at Harvard, where Jack was a graduate student and she was a research assistant (1932-33) after graduating from Radcliffe College (magna cum laude) and marrying Jack, both in 1931. They serenaded us auf Deutsch with folksongs from their 1933 study-year at the University of Vienna and their bicycle tour of Germany. Jack reminisced about their canoe trip with Freud’s son, who schemed to strand Jack on shore in order to be alone with lovely Matilda! They recounted their misadventures of the early ASA annual meetings when Matilda was its first Executive Officer (1949-1960) and she carried its records in a box from her home to the meetings. They described Matilda’s experiences as the Chief Consulting Economist for the U.S. War Production Board (1942-1944) and alluded imprecisely to Jack’s wartime service in the OSS (Office of Strategic Services). We learned of Matilda’s success in establishing, with her father, the pioneering Market Research Company of America (1939-49), where she developed and applied sophisticated sampling and survey techniques based upon her sociological methods and knowledge.

We heard of Matilda’s productive career at Rutgers University, progressing from Research Specialist to University Professor (1950-73), where she authored a research textbook that introduced combining theory and methods and where she began her scholarly interest in age and aging. She continued her pioneering work in the sociology of aging at the Russell Sage Foundation (1974-77), based on her classic volumes on the age-stratification paradigm and aging society perspective. They spoke of their “final” career and geographical move back to Mere Point in Brunswick, Maine, where Matilda became the first woman full professor (1973-81) at Jack’s alma mater, Bowdoin College.

They entertained us with stories of camping trips with their two children, including the time they became snowbound in the Grand Tetons! They expressed pride in the accomplishments of their son, John W. Riley, III, as a physician, and their daughter, Lucy Sallick, as an artist. (Later they shared stories of their grandchildren and greatgrandchildren!) They made us laugh with the tale of being locked out of their rented home at Stanford while skinny dipping one night. In the buff, gallant Jack had to ask a neighbor for the house key in order to retrieve their clothing.

In 1979 at the age of 68, Matilda embarked on a 20-year career at the National Institute on Aging (NIA) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The NIA’s founding director, Robert N. Butler, and the NIH Director, Donald Frederickson, invited Matilda to establish the NIA’s granting program on Social and Behavioral Research (SBR) as well as to guide the expansion and integration of these disciplines throughout the NIH. During her first year at the NIA, she and Kathleen Bond (one of her former graduate students) developed and implemented a multidisciplinary vision for research on aging that integrated the aging of individuals into societal structures. This program emphasized the influence of social structures on the lives of individuals (Matilda exclaimed often, “People don’t grow up and grow old in laboratories—they grow up and grow old in changing societies.”) and the lives of individuals on social structures. This vision extended to the biological sciences, for Matilda recognized the need for a biopsychosocial understanding. The publication of this blueprint as a NIH program announcement set the course of NIA’s program and influences its direction even to this day.

With the publication of a second paradigmatic program announcement, Health and Effective Functioning in the Middle and Later Years, Matilda expanded the NIH’s disease- and organsystem-oriented worldview by introducing the concept of effective functioning as an equally important concern. By this she meant that research and policy should also address social and psychological functioning, such as the performance of social roles and maintenance or even improvement of cognitive skills. A major goal should be extending the healthy and productive middle years of life as far as possible into the later years of life.
Under Matilda’s guidance, NIA’s multidisciplinary program became a substantial supporter of behavioral and social science research and exerted a disproportionate influence upon the practice of behavioral and social science at NIH. Her vision of positive aging inspired many innovative research projects and attracted talented social, behavioral, and health scientists to the study of age and aging.

While guiding the NIA, she provided leadership across the NIH in her role as chairperson of landmark committees regarding health and behavior. She was co-chair of the joint ADAMHA (Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration) and NIH Steering Committee for the Institute of Medicine’s Project on Health and Behavior (1979-1982) and chair of the trans-NIH Working Group on Health and Behavior (1982-1991). In these capacities she served as the senior NIH spokesperson on the behavioral and social sciences, encouraged coordination among NIH Institutes, oversaw the production of numerous reports to the Congress on behavioral research at the NIH, provided advice to several NIH Directors, and initiated the behavioral and social sciences seminar series at the NIH.

While at the NIA and after her departure in 1998, Matilda continued to contribute, even in her 90s, to the scientific literature on aging and the life course through a series of publications, lectures, conferences, and workshops. Over her last decade, her emphasis turned increasingly to the problem of age segregation and to the potential for restructuring social institutions to achieve age integration.

In recognition of her contributions, she received multitudinous honors and appointments. Among these were her elections as the President of the Eastern Sociological Society (1976), of the American Sociological Association (1985- 86) and of the ASA Section on Aging (1989); selection to the National Academy of Sciences and the Institute of Medicine; membership in the Academy of Behavioral Medicine Research; recipient of the ASA Section on Aging Distinguished Scholar Award (1988); and of the Gerontological Society of America Distinguished Creative Contribution to Gerontology (1990) and Kent (1992) awards; and appointment as the only ever social Scientist Emeritus at the NIH (1998). In 2001 the NIH organized a series of lectures in her honor, titled “Soaring: An Exploration of Science and the Life Course.” The lectures highlighted some areas in which she made significant contributions: age and aging, methodology, communications, and health and behavior. The title was drawn from her first publication, Gliding and Soaring: An Introduction to Motorless Flight, which she authored as “Mat White” with her father. The publishers believed in 1931 that no one would buy a book on flying authored by a 20-year-old “Matilda” and changed her name to the more masculine sounding “Mat.”

What was it like to work with Matilda on a daily basis? Here is a prototypical experience, when she was a keynote speaker at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. The meetings were in Boston that August, and I was the chair of the session at which she was speaking. Matilda had planned on flying from Washington to Boston on the day of her afternoon lecture. As the date approached, she became concerned about the weather. What if thunderstorms delayed or prevented her flight? She couldn’t depart any earlier because of other commitments. Her solution was to pack me off before her with her lecture. (This meant she was finished two days in advance!) Not only did she provide me with the lecture, but with instructions for dramatic pauses and emphases as well as hand gestures to be used in describing her diagram for life course development!

This was typical Matilda. As a young adult of the Depression, she worried about everything that could go wrong and prepared to face it. The only flaw in her plan was I! As a child of the Mad Magazine generation, my approach was “What? Me worry?” and I didn’t practice the delivery of the paper. As the time of her lecture approached, I began to question the wisdom of Mad Magazine’s Alfred E. Newman. Five minutes to go, and no Matilda! Thankfully, she appeared just as I was awkwardly rehearsing the gestures required to illustrate cross-sectional vs. longitudinal aspects of cohorts and the life course.

Soaring is an apt metaphor for her professional and private lives. Creativity, vision, compassion, adventure, and enthusiasm hallmarked both. “Like many of us, I was ‘adopted’ by Matilda and feel the loss of her like the loss of a parent” (Kathleen Bond, November 16, 2004).


The full obituary by Ronald P. Abeles originally appeared in the January 2005 issue of Footnotes.

Introducing 2023 ASA President Prudence Carter

Prudence Carter has conquered many firsts in her bold and brilliant career. In 2001, she became the first African American woman to join the faculty in the Department of Sociology at Harvard University. Six years later, she was recruited by the Stanford Graduate School of Education as a tenured associate professor, and rose to become the Jacks Family Professor of Education and Sociology. Her meteoric rise as a scholar is matched by her astounding rise as a leader. In 2016, Prudence was appointed as Dean of the Graduate School of Education at Berkeley—becoming the school’s youngest and first African American woman dean. After stepping down as dean last year, she returned to her ever-true alma mater Brown University to become the inaugural Sarah and Joseph Jr. Dowling Professor of Sociology.

Conquering Firsts and Opening Doors

Conquering firsts is what Prudence Carter does. As the first, she ensures that she is not the last by opening the door for others. Why is this important? Through her research and experiences, Prudence recognizes that questions go unasked, assumptions remain unchallenged, and intellectual perspectives become narrow in institutions and disciplines that lack diversity.

Allow me to pause for a moment to add that I have known Prudence since we were budding sociologists in graduate school at Columbia University. Through our vibrant exchanges during graduate school and the many that followed, I have been (and continue to be) inspired by Prudence’s brilliance, her unwavering commitment to close opportunity gaps, and her bold vision for an educative and transformative sociology. During our journey as sociologists, I have marveled as I watched Prudence deftly dismantle tropes, reframe narratives, and advocate for more just, inclusive, and culturally flexible policies.

One of her co-authors, Sean Reardon, had this to say about her: “More than any academic I know, Prudence’s scholarship and professional leadership are guided by her clear moral compass and attunement to the symbolic and experienced inequalities in society. I’ve learned an enormous amount from her as a colleague and a friend.”

Learning from Prudence makes you better. Working with her inspires you to do better. It is my privilege to introduce you to 2022-23 ASA President Prudence Carter.

Slaying the Myth of Oppositional Culture

One of my early insights into Prudence’s bold brilliance was in graduate school when we read Signithia Fordham and John Ogbu’s 1986 article, “Black students’ school success: Coping with the “burden of ‘acting white’”. Fordham and Ogbu argued that Black students underperformed in school because they adopted a reactive, oppositional culture in which excelling in school was tantamount to “acting white.” The fear of being accused of “acting white” by their peers, in turn, diminished Black students’ academic effort and performance. Oppositional culture became the go-to explanation for the pernicious Black-White achievement gap, and was adopted by leading scholars of race, education, culture, and immigration.

Prudence’s dissertation research—which laid the foundations for her first book, Keepin’ It Real: School Success Beyond Black and White (Oxford University Press 2005)—slayed the myth of oppositional culture and anti-achievement ideology among Black youth. Based on interviews and observation of 68 students over a 10-month period, Prudence found no evidence of oppositional culture. Listening to the students, she learned that they used the phrase “acting white” to describe styles, tastes, and codes that they associated with middle-class whites. Furthermore, Prudence found that poor Black and Latinx students do, in fact, subscribe to the achievement ideology of education as the vehicle to socioeconomic mobility, but the vast majority lacked the material resources and dominant cultural capital to achieve mobility through education alone.

Here, Prudence made another insightful theoretical intervention. Challenging the belief that there is a singular type of cultural capital, she identified “nondominant cultural capital,” characterized by a set of tastes, appreciations, and understandings employed by lower status group members to gain “authentic” cultural status positions in their communities. For many Black and Latinx students, nondominant cultural capital matters because it signifies in-group allegiance and preserves a sense of belonging. While not a single student devalued high academic achievement nor disparaged peers who were smart, they did care if their peers repudiated in-group cultural codes and knowledge.

By asking the right questions, Prudence masterfully challenged oft-held assumptions, and, in the process, dismantled the trope of “acting white” as an anti-achievement ideology. That she had the courage do this as a graduate student and an untenured assistant professor is a testament to Prudence’s bold brilliance. Keepin’ It Real was awarded ASA’s Oliver Cromwell Cox Award for the best book on race and the eradication of racism in 2006.

Organizational Habitus and Cultural Flexibility

Prudence’s next project was even more ambitious: a pioneering comparative study of eight schools in four cities and two countries, which eventuated in her second book, Stubborn Roots: Race, Culture, and Inequality in U.S. and South African Schools (Oxford University Press 2012). While the United States and South Africa differ in their racial compositions, they share a legacy of racial exclusion and a history of racial inequality, which they have sought to transform through school desegregation. Neither has been successful, however, because desegregation alone is not the answer. Prudence’s research reveals why.

Drawing on her keen ethnographic and interviewing skills, she draws our attention to the organizational habitus of schools, including what they teach (their curricula) and how they teach (their pedagogy), both within and beyond the classroom. She unveils the angst that minoritized students experience when they are perceived as representatives of their race while remaining invisible in their curricula in which the content fails to reflect their social, historical, and material realities. Moreover, she finds that desegregation and color-blind policies do not disrupt persistent patterns of racial segregation and inequality within schools.

In the United States, segregation is maintained through organizational practices such as the racialization of academic tracking, as well as participation in select athletic and extracurricular activities. Cheerleading is to white students as stepping is to Black students, for example. In South Africa, inequality persists though universal policies that demean minoritized students, including dress codes and styles that center on the practices of white youth. Universal color-blind policies, codes, and curricula can marginalize minoritized students in ways that amplify racial and cultural inequality.

Prudence urges researchers to attend to organizational habitus, and focus on “cultural flexibility.” This involves institutional policies and practices that promote cultural inclusion and belonging such that cultural differences are respected rather than debased or ignored, and ties across social boundaries encouraged. Prioritizing cultural flexibility would, in turn, create an inclusive educational experience for all students across racial and class boundaries.

Fellow Trustee at the William T. Grant Foundation Hiro Yoshikawa shared this: “Prudence is a visionary leader and scholar in the sociology of education, having conducted landmark studies on race, culture, systems and educational inequality in the U.S. and South Africa. She will bring her years of expertise in working not just to empirically describe, but to reduce racial, relational, and other forms of inequality to her new leadership position.”

An Invitation to Be Bolder, Transformative, and Radically Inclusive

An inimitable voice for bolder and transformative education policies, Prudence has most recently laid out the multidimensional forms of inequality that persist at the macro, meso, and micro levels. Addressing these requires multidimensional solutions. “Radical inclusion” in schools and communities is the path forward, with the goal of closing opportunity gaps so that access to and full participation in the economy, government, and schools is possible so that no group languishes at the margins.

Prudence’s intellectual trajectory serves as the foundation for her inspiring theme for the ASA 2023 Annual Meeting: The Educative Power of Sociology. At a time when the United States is experiencing a regressive turning point, voting rights are under assault, and federal constitutional protections of women’s reproductive rights undone, Prudence encourages us to reflect and act on the discipline’s educative power. How can we move toward bolder, transformative, and useful directions for social progress?

The call is morally urgent. As Prudence elaborates, “State legislatures have also outlawed explicit teaching of the nation’s history, about race and racism, anti-Semitism, and explicit references to certain books and ideas that highlight the racial hierarchy at the core of U.S. society and beyond… Competitiveness and fear of encroachment on individual choice motivate communities to reproduce thick social boundaries and segregation and to limit the sharing of resources and power significantly with historically underrepresented groups in access to departments, colleges, and universities.”

It is in this context that Prudence invites us to produce new scholarship, research, and policy frameworks that aim to focus on the use and utility of sociological thought and research in institutions, organizations, and society; disrupt the academic hierarchy of social science; expand and connect more intentionally with global sociologies; and engage in reflexivity and conduct a sociology of sociology.

That Philadelphia will host the ASA 2023 Annual Meeting is fitting. Home to the Liberty Bell and the signing of the Declaration of Independence, Philadelphia boasts a rich history of civil rights. The Pennsylvania Abolition Society met there in 1775, and the American Anti-Slavery Society, which grew to nearly 250,000 members by 1838, was established in Philadelphia. And outside of Independence Hall, Susan B. Anthony delivered the Declaration of the Rights of Women in 1876. The history of Philadelphia provides an iconic backdrop to Prudence’s bold theme for the Annual Meeting.

The Professional Is Personal

In her stunning address at the 16th Annual American Educational Research Association Brown Lecture, Prudence shared that she is the granddaughter of sharecroppers and the daughter of Mississippi educators. Educated in a de facto segregated school system in which her teachers and all but two of her classmates were African American, she was taught that college was expected and upward mobility attainable.

“We were the embodiment of the dreams that our ancestors, our foreparents, and our parents held,” Prudence affirmed. “Those who had toiled in the Mississippi Delta under the hot sweltering sun. They toiled under economic exploitation, white supremacy, and deep oppression. But they kept that hope alive, and their children, and their children passed it along to their children.”

As Prudence grew older, she knew enough to question whether she was getting the most rigorous education. Upon the recommendation of one of her teachers, Prudence’s parents applied for her to attend a six-week summer program at an elite boarding school on the East Coast. Prudence was admitted, and for the first time was exposed to students from all 50 states and from around the globe. She engaged with a diverse array of perspectives, ideologies, and social, cultural and political realities.

That summer program was a “catalytic moment” in Prudence’s trajectory that would propel her on a path that diverged from her classmates in Mississippi. She would conquer firsts, open doors, and become a leader in our discipline who would inspire a legion of others.

Dean Linda Burton of Berkeley’s School of Social Welfare described Prudence as “a treasured North star,” adding that “every university needs a Prudence. She is a quintessential game-changer with laser sharp vision and outstanding leadership skills, an authentic collaborative spirit, and a cutting-edge scholar and researcher. Her penchant for mentoring her students is beyond inspiring as she guides them to become their best selves.”

And Dr. Reena Karani, a dear friend of Prudence’s for over three decades, shared that “Prudence believes in—and is utterly committed to—a more equitable and just future. She has dedicated her life to ending disparities in education and mobility faced by the most vulnerable among us, and will bring her rich lived experiences, proud intersecting identities, and brilliant mind and heart to the work of the organization and field.”

I hope this glimpse of who Prudence Carter is and what she brings to the American Sociological Association conveys how immensely fortunate we are to have her as our President.


Written by Jennifer Lee, Julian Clarence Levi Professor of Social Sciences, Columbia University, and originally published in Footnotes, Volume 50, Issue 4.