Situation
Professor Harry Gregorian is the advisor for a large undergraduate program. He has been receiving persistent demands on e-mail from a student who has been placed on academic probation. The student is quite belligerent about his probationary status. Professor Gregorian suspects from past meetings that the student is trying to “work the system” to get around college requirements. He gives the student a stern response on e-mail, suggesting that he should take time to reassess his skills and interests and return to college only after he has met the probationary requirements. The student bounces this e-mail to the Chancellor, the Ombudsperson and the Dean claiming “harsh treatment” and unsympathetic advising in the department as a major reason for his difficulties in the program.
Questions
- What are the ethics of providing advising over electronic mail?
- How do issues of confidentiality enter into a “private” conversations on a university owned system? Are students obligated to keep e-mail confidential?
Discussion
Given the capacity for misunderstanding in difficult situations, it might be wiser to restrict communi-cation in tough times to scheduling a face-to-face meetings. The “partial” trail of an electronic medium may be more damaging than a paper trail in trying to achieve the end goal — good advising that benefits the individual student and the department.
Student input on our advising and teaching activities should be gathered on a regular basis, not in an emergency situation. In such circumstances, students may feel pressured to respond and may be adversely affected by not understanding their role in such a “crisis”.
