Sociological researchers to brief Senate staff on
contemporary social and
cultural influences on personnel and capacity.
The reportedly
overstretched U.S. military in Iraq, with troops serving unprecedented third and
fourth tours, has provoked debate about military preparedness. At the same time,
public controversy over the 14-year-old “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT) policy is
reemerging as increasing numbers of service members disclose sexual orientations
in conflict with DADT. According the Department of Defense, 11,000 troops were
discharged because of the military’s ban on openly gay service members. The
importance of the scientific basis for DADT deserves attention relative to
military personnel effectiveness and performance. Meanwhile, the military’s
granting of “moral waivers” to applicants with criminal records has spurred some
critics to say that capable soldiers are being needlessly sacrificed while
recruits with drug abuse, criminal backgrounds, or insufficient education are
being admitted.
In November 2006, distinguished social scientists
authored an Amicus Brief filed jointly with the American Sociological
Association (ASA) with the First Circuit Court of Appeals. There is no
scientific evidence supporting the exclusion of openly gay or lesbian soldiers
in the military in terms of military performance, according to the brief.
Research on the nature of military unit cohesion fails to show detriments in
performance. Of prime importance, empirical work shows, is identification with
task.
While military recruitment in March of 2007 remained solid, a
recent
Newsweek poll indicates that 63 percent of Americans believe gays
and lesbians should be able to serve openly. In addition, the U.S. Army’s tour
extensions to 15 months are taking an emotional toll on families and troops. The
military prides itself on structured and disciplined lifestyle. However, as the
demand for troop surges heightens, as more and more soldiers are “coming out,”
and as families deal with the pressures of longer tours, the military finds
itself approaching a critical social-cultural crossroad. Military sociologists
Dr. Morten Ender and Dr. David R. Segal, and Former Marine Sergeant Brian
Fricke, will brief Senate and Capitol Hill staff on these issues affecting the
military today.
WHO:
Dr. Morten Ender, Associate Professor
of Sociology, Department of Behavioral Sciences and Leadership, United States
Military Academy, West Point, New York,
Former Marine Sergeant Brian
Fricke, who elected not to re-enlist because of the military's DADT ban on
openly gay personnel, and
Dr. David R. Segal, Professor of Sociology and
Director of the Center for Research on Military Organization, University of
Maryland.
WHAT: Social science briefing to the Senate and Capitol
Hill staff on military recruitment and retention, and the impact of current
social and cultural factors.
WHEN: Friday, May 18, 2007, 3:00 -
4:30 PM
WHERE: Russell Senate Office Building, Room 485, Indian
Affairs Room, Washington, DC.
RSVP: Jesse Klempner (Rep. Meehan)
at jesse.klempner@mail.house.gov