Progress in Breaking the Glass Ceiling
Indicators of Change for Women in ASA between 2001 and 2007
by Roberta Spalter-Roth and Janene Scelza,
ASA Research and Development Program
The American Sociological Association
has been compiling data on women’s
status in the profession for more than
four decades. The data in this article
continue that tradition by providing
information on
the changing
status of women
and men who
were regular
members of the
ASA since the
start of the 21st
century (between
2001 and 2007).
Regular members
pay full
membership
dues, purchase
journals, and are
eligible to vote in
the Association.
Full-time faculty
members in
sociology departments
who join
ASA do so as regular members. The information
provided below is collected from
the form that individuals complete when
joining the ASA. It should be noted that
not all members answer every item. About
one-third of all sociology PhDs are members
of the Association. For these reasons,
the findings cited here should be read
with caution since they may not reflect
perfectly the changes that are occurring
Progress in Breaking the Glass Ceiling
Indicators of Change for Women in ASA between 2001 and 2007
within ASA and may not be representative
of all advanced-degree sociologists.
About 8 out of 10 members answered
the gender category in 2007. The number
of regular members who checked that they
were female surpassed the numbers who
checked that they were male (3,925 versus
3,852) for the first time in ASA’s 102-year
history. If these
figures are
reliable, then
women represent
slightly
more than half
of the regular
membership, an
increase of one
percent since
2005 and four
percent since
2001. Of these
regular members,
64 percent
of women and
68 percent of
men hold PhDs.
Indicators of
Progress
Between 2001 and 2007, the membership
data suggest that women sociologists
have broken through the glass ceiling in
the academic labor market that historically
kept them in part-time positions outside
of research universities. Nonetheless, while
some indicators suggest that women continue
to make progress, other indicators
suggest no change. For example, the gap in
full-time employment between women and
men who were regular members decreased
between 2001 and 2007. By 2007, the number
of women employed full time compared
to men was almost at parity, with 88
percent of women employed in full-time
positions compared to 92 percent of men.
Yet, the percent of women in full-time
positions has remained unchanged since
2005, indicating a possible lack of progress
for women, despite the increase in the
number of members in this category.
In 2001, 45 percent of all female regular
members of ASA held faculty positions
compared to 55 percent of males. By 2007,
this increased to 49 percent of women,
although this progress does not mean
that women are in similar ranks as men.
Unfortunately, the membership form
does not ask for information on academic
rank. We will need to wait for the results
of the forthcoming ASA Department
Survey to see gender differences by rank
in AY 2007-08. In AY 2000-01, the last
time the survey was conducted, women
constituted 26 percent of full professors, 42
percent of associate professors, and 52 of
assistant professors. These figures suggest
that women who are members of ASA are
moving into full-time faculty positions. Additional information is needed to know
if women will continue to climb the academic
ladder and reach parity with men
as they age. (In 2007, the reported median
age of male regular members was 51 while
the reported median age of women was
44.)
In 2007, 52 percent of all women
regular members reported that they were
employed by universities that granted
graduate degrees. Although the number of
women in these institutions has increased
since 2001, the share of all women in
these institutions stood still (a one percent
decline from 53 percent of all women
in 2005). Figure 1 shows the increase in
the number of women regular members
employed at universities offering graduate
degrees in sociology and their stability in
their share of these positions. In contrast,
57 percent of men in 2007 were faculty at
universities that granted graduate degrees
in sociology. The share of men at this type
of institution also remained stable (a one
percent increase since 2005), despite an increase in the number of men in this
position. Yet, women continue to outnumber
men at schools that grant only a baccalaureate
degree. Between 2001 and 2007,
there was an increase in the number of
regular members reporting that they were
employed at baccalaureate-only schools.
In spite of this increase in numbers, the
shares of women and men remained
relatively steady, with 17 percent of all
women and 14 percent of all men at these
institutions.
Income is an area with limited progress.
As of 2007, 24 percent of women earned
$70,000 or more compared to 38 percent
of men. This 14 percent gap has remained
constant since 2001. We know that much
of this difference can be explained by
differences in rank, employment status,
age, type of institution, and areas in which
there appears to be a recent lack of progress
in breaking the glass ceiling.
Future Information
In a future research brief we will be
adding to the indicators of women’s status
by examining normative career patterns,
organizational climates, cultures, and distributions
of institutional resources.