Sociologists Examine the Global
Labor Market in STEM Occupations
by Nicole Van Vooren, ASA Research and
Development Department
Washington, DC—Sociologists were
well represented among the policy, higher
education, government, and non-profit
panelists at the national Commission on
Professionals in Science and Technology’s
(CPST) conference, “Can We Compete?
Trends in America’s Scientific and
Technical Workforce.” The fall 2007
presentations, coinciding with the presentation
of results from CPST’s STEM
Workforce Data
Project, focused
on the global
issues affecting
the scientific,
technological,
engineering, and
mathematical
(STEM) workforce.
Sociologists
at the AAAS
(American
Association for
the Advancement of Science) discussed
the social context of issues related to
immigrants, women, and racial/ethnic
minorities in academia, and the effect of
globalization on the demand for scientists
and engineers. Lisa Frehill, Executive
Director of CPST, Roberta Spalter-Roth,
American Sociological Association, and
Daryl Chubin, AAAS, added to the number
of sociologists in attendance as the
coordinators of the conference. The sociology
presentations are summarized below.
Laurel Smith-Doerr, Boston
University, presented research on immigrant
entrepreneurs that found that almost
26% of New England’s science-based
biotech firms had at least one immigrant
founder and that 25% of foreign-born
founders were from England and India.
She also found that Massachusetts is
From left to right: Mary Frank Fox and Cheryl Leggon,
both of the School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute
of Technology
Sociologists Examine the Global
Labor Market in STEM Occupations
unique in attracting immigrant founders
because it boasts the largest number of
universities per capita. While this intellectual
capita attracts immigrants to the
region, social networks were reported
as most important in overcoming many
hurdles of entrepreneurship.
In his research on immigrants in the
U.S. STEM workforce, B. Lindsay Lowell,
Georgetown University, found that while
the number of foreign born working in
STEM jobs increased significantly in the
1990s, their percentage of the total STEM
workforce has
remained fairly
steady. Growth
in the Physical
and Life
Sciences has
been the most
significant; in
2002 the largest
number of
foreign born
in the Life
Sciences was
Asian and Latino. White, non-Hispanics
were the least represented in all of the
core-STEM workforce.
Mary Frank Fox, Georgia Institute of
Technology, focused on faculty women’s
participation, status, and rank in Science
and Engineering departments using data
from the Survey of Faculty in Computer
Science, Engineering, and Sciences. She
identified four areas within what she
called the “social-organizational features
of work” that demonstrate challenges and
opportunities of women faculty. These
areas include: The frequency that women
and men spoke about their research, their
ratings of different aspects of their position,
characterizations of departmental
climate, and how they experienced the work/family divide. Restructuring institutions
was suggested as a way to resolve
these issues.
Also from the Georgia Institute of
Technology, Cheryl Leggon focused
on the intersection of race, ethnicity,
and gender in STEM faculties and the
question of who will teach science at
the post-secondary level. She illustrated
the synergistic relationship between
race, ethnicity, and gender affecting how
women from underrepresented minority
groups are represented in post-secondary
institutions. She suggested reconceptualizing
the three features to ensure
that women of color do not fall through
the cracks. She outlined an NSF initiative
at the Georgia Institute of Technology
called “Cross-Disciplinary Initiative
for Minority Women Faculty” that is
addressing these issues.
Harold Salzman, Urban Institute,
analyzed many current misconceptions
concerning the offshoring effects on the
STEM workforce in the United States
and recommended new policies that
handle the declining U.S. competitiveness.
These policies include investing in
broad education programs that comprise
social science and communication rather
than exclusively technical skills, which
will enable the United States to increase
its ability to globally compete. Salzman
also suggested developing a collaborative
strategy based on interdependence
rather than a “techno-autarky” strategy.
For more information about
the conference and CPST’s STEM
Workforce Data Project, visit cpst.org/2007Meeting/STEM_Meeting.cfm.