House Science Committee Holds Hearing
Featuring Sociologist Expert on Science Education
Subcommittee examines undergraduate science, math, and engineering
education and teacher preparation, and why students leave or avert the sciences
MARCH 15, 2006, WASHINGTON, DC—
The Research Subcommittee of the
House Committee on Science held a
hearing looking into the condition of
teacher education in STEM areas (i.e.,
science, technology, engineering, and
mathematics). The five-member
witness panel included sociologist
Elaine Seymour of the University of
Colorado-Boulder. Seymour was the
first to deliver her prepared statement.
Other witnesses included Carl
Wieman, the 2001 winner of the
Nobel Prize in Physics and a distinguished
professor of Physics at the
University of Colorado-Boulder;
Daniel L. Goroff, Vice President and Dean of Faculty at Harvey Mudd College; John
Burris, President of Beloit College in Wisconsin; Margaret Collins, the Assistant Dean of
Science, Business and Computer Technology at Moraine Valley Community College,
Chicago, Illinois.
Witnesses emphasized that a critical issue in successful STEM education (i.e.,
recruiting, retaining, and properly training STEM undergraduate students who want to
pursue teaching or who become TAs) is quality, not quantity. Witnesses addressed
STEM teacher preparation and in-service teacher professional development issues and
identified NSF repeatedly for praise for its educational research programs. The witnesses
touted NSF as the agency from which federal STEM education research and
related activities should originate.
Seymour and other witnesses talked about changing the incentives to encourage the
American culture and higher education/academic culture to learn to value teaching.
Panelists also agreed that undergraduate science education efforts at NSF should
double in alignment with the President’s proposal to double the entire NSF budget
over the next ten years, beginning in FY 2007. The hearing also highlighted the need to
maintain sufficient numbers of STEM graduates by encouraging and achieving higher
participation by minorities and by
women. The full testimony of each
witness can be accessed on the House
Science Committee website at
www.house.gov/science/hearings/research06/march%2015/index.htm.
This hearing was part of the
House Science Committee’s continuing
discussion on innovation and U.S.
competitiveness. In attendance were
the following eight Representatives:
Mark Udall (CO), Bob Inglis, Subcommittee
Chair (SC), Vernon Ehlers (MI),
Dana Rohrabacher (CA), Daniel
Lipinski (IL), Eddie Bernice Johnson
(TX), Todd Akin (MO), and Gil
Gutknecht (MN).