Jane Jenkins is the editor of a peer-reviewed, sociology journal. She
has received a submission from a sociologist whose work lies in a very
specialized area. She is well acquainted with the handful of
researchers who work in this area but is concerned with the small area
but is concerned with the small pool of potential reviewers. The
scholars in the area are well informed about each others' work and
blind reviewing is almost impossible.
Questions
1. What kinds of problems does Jane Jenkins face?
2. How might she resolve this dilemma?
Reflect on the above questions and form your
own answers before clicking the Discussion
key to review the commentary provided with this case.
Discussion
The general principle that reviews should be done by knowledgeable
scholars is as compelling in a highly specialized field as in any
other. The editor faces two issues: overworking a small pool of
scholars and making certain that the pool's knowledge of each others'
work will not bias their evaluations. As a check on objectivity, the
editor might ask a seasoned generalist for a third review on the
paper's theoretical significance. To lighten the work load, the editor
might explore potential reviewers from related disciplines.