Dr. Joe White, chair at a liberal arts university, has many requests
for faculty to serve on university committees, community boards and
other academic organizations in addition to having to staff his own
departmental committees. Most frequently, Dr. White turns to Michael
Sanchez, an untenured member of the Department, to fill these service
positions because he believes that a diverse view-point is valuable.
Dr. Sanchez feels he has little choice but to agree for the good of the
department. The consequence is that his research is suffering, he has
been "double booked" for many activities, and he has been routinely
canceling appointments at the last minute, or recorded as a "no
show."
Questions
What are the responsibilities of sociologists to
provide service
to their work setting when they have unique skills or perspectives that
are in high demand? Is this an ethical responsibility?
What are the equity issues involved in being
targeted for service
committee work because of one's race/ethnicity or gender?
What is the role of a Chair in setting a fair
distribution of service responsibilities?
Reflect on the above questions and form your
own answers before clicking the discussion
key to review the commentary provided with this case.
Discussion
Traditionally, the smaller proportion of minority and female academics
and researchers in general has created a substantial service burden for
some individuals. While this may be a transitional time in the academy
and in private research settings, there will always be situations where
some individuals are called on more than others. In this case, while it
is laudable for the Chair to recognize and promote ideas of diversity,
his over-reliance on Dr. Sanchez has created a situation which puts Dr.
Sanchez's career in jeopardy and does not reflect well on the
Department and its service mission. Chairs stand in a position to
mediate organizational demands in an equitable manner. In particular,
supervisors and Chairs should take careful note of the demands placed
on junior faculty members. These issues also should be discussed with
graduate student supervisees as they move into the job market, and
service expectations should be made as explicit in job search
procedures as research and teaching expectations.
Individual sociologists have an ethical responsibility to clarify their
limits for effective service. While the demand levels may be unfair, it
is incumbent upon individuals to limit their own commitments so that
they do not stymie the work of others.