Classroom instruction at most institutions of higher education has no
"substitute teaching corps" on which to draw. Instructors are often
expected to "swap" classroom teaching when illness, profess-sional
obligations, or family obligations remove them from the classroom.
However, this is an emergency remedy, and should never become a routine
event. Scheduling a "mini vacation" in the middle of an academic term
is an unethical use of this system and signals intent to break the
contracted teaching assignment.
The scenario also raises the issue of "fair compensation" to graduate
students. A "room at the inn" that is paid for out of department funds,
out of grants or even out of private funds is not adequate
compensation. The faculty member should clarify from the outset the
need for a replacement instructor with the department chair; if a
replacement is approved for this scenario (which is unlikely) then the
rate of payment should be set by department guidelines. In some limited
instances, a graduate student might take a course at "no pay" when it
is an opportunity for professional experience or advancement that he or
she might not otherwise have. Likewise, faculty may "swap" classes with
a graduate instructor to cover for personal time away from teaching
assignments, if the swap is agreed to as fair by both instructors.
It is irrelevant whether these graduate students are in TA roles. This
is a case of inadequate training (5a) or inappropriate delegation (5b).
If Professor York develops a strategy for the graduate students to take
over these classes and outlines educational objectives for both the
undergraduate and graduate students, then this approach may be
appropriate. However, the issue of frequency remains and there does not
appear to be any attempt to reschedule contact hours with students. In
addition, the use of resources of whatever kind, to compensate graduate
students raises issues of appropriateness and boundaries.