Barbara
Reskin’s theoretical and empirical writings have reoriented research on
gender and racial inequalities, particularly in employment, and serve
as a model for sociological scholarship that is theoretically rich and
politically relevant. Through her path-breaking publications on gender
segregation and affirmative action, her membership on and directorship
of influential National Academy of Sciences committees, her service as
Vice President and President of the American Sociological Association,
and her applied work on issues related to employment inequalities, she
has contributed to the advancement of our discipline in the academy and
beyond.For these signal achievements, we honor her with the 2008 W.E.B. DuBois Career of Distinguished Scholarship Award.
Reskin
followed with cutting-edge research and insightful reviews that
transformed scholarship on occupational sex segregation by reframing
the terms of the debate and asserting the importance of analyzing both
distal and proximal causal mechanisms. The books, Sex Segregation in the Workplace and Women’s Work, Men’s Work
(with Heidi Hartmann) introduced the crucial distinction between
occupational segregation and job segregation; they are widely
considered classics in the field. Reskin’s Cheryl Miller Lecture
“Bringing the Men Back In” further exemplifies the theoretical reach of
her early work.She argued that standard explanations of the wage gap were too narrow:they
ignored men’s incentives to preserve their own advantage, their ability
to change the rules to do so, and the ways they differentiated
themselves from the subordinate group. Following this
logic, Reskin expressed skepticism that policies such as comparable
worth would create lasting change because vested interests would
subvert them. Reskin’s subsequent book, Job Queues, Gender Queues (with Patricia Roos) pushed the field to move beyond questions of whether gender inequalities exist to questions of why and how. Using case studies of occupations that experienced a disproportionate influx of women workers, Job Queues
showed that the jobs that become available to women are those that
become unattractive to men (because of reduced wages, lowered autonomy,
and deskilling); these processes result in gender resegregation. More
recently, Reskin has extended her work through analyses of how
organizational practices enhance or suppress gender and racial bias in
employment, and of the interaction of race and gender in the labor
market. Throughout her career, and perhaps most eloquently in her 2002
ASA Presidential Address, Reskin has challenged us to identify the
mechanisms, rather than the motives, that foster and sustain ascriptive
inequalities as only by understanding those mechanisms can we develop
policies that promote equality.
Reskin
has brought the same deep insight and empirical rigor to her work on
affirmative action, a topic in which she became deeply engaged while
President of the ASA. She prepared the final report from a conference
on affirmative action which emphasized the distinction between the
dramatic rhetoric of affirmative action in public discourse and the
mundane realities of the employment policies and recruitment practices
that undermine or support it. She wrote the amicus curiae brief for the
U.S. Supreme Court hearing in Grutter v. Bollinger which later formed the nucleus of Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s opinion.
Reskin’s
work has been influential far beyond the confines of sociology. The
almost 2,000 citations to her work extend across industrial relations,
management studies, social work, psychology, political science,
education, and law, among other fields. Reskin also has mentored many
young scholars who have gone on to make important contributions of
their own. Her current colleagues testify to her continuing involvement
in graduate student mentorship through the intensive training she
provides her advisees as well as her organization of professional
development workshops.